Cookies on oxfam

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience on our website. If you continue browsing, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more Close

'Country ownership': a term whose time has gone

'Country ownership': a term whose time has gone
5 pages

Buiter, Willem H

Eade, Deborah
Development in Practice Volume 17 Issue 4 & 5 Buzzwords and Fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse

Publication date
01 Aug 2007


Oxfam GB

Journal article

The term 'country ownership' refers to a property of the conditionality attached to programmes, processes, plans, or strategies involving both a 'domestic' party (generally a nation state) and a foreign party (generally the IMF, the World Bank, the Regional Development Banks, and other multilateral and bilateral institutions). Under what circumstances and how can the concept of country ownership be relevant to a country with a myriad heterogeneous and often conflicting views and interests? Or to a country whose government's representational legitimacy or democratic credentials are in question? The author argues that the term has been abused to such an extent that it is at best unhelpful and at worst pernicious: a term whose time has gone.


This article is hosted by our co-publisher Taylor & Francis. To download the article for free from Taylor & Francis Online please use the link below. If you encounter any problems please email us at

For the full table of contents for this and previous issues of this journal, please visit the Gender and Development website.

Download this article from Taylor & Francis Online