What would it take to deliver a living wage in supply chains?
Rachel Wilshaw Ethical Trade Manager
10th Dec 2014
The concept of a living wage is not something new, but with recent reports warning of the lag between wages and productivity and outlining the failures in trickle down economics, it is in the spotlight. On Human Rights Day, Rachel Wilshaw talks about what has been done and what more companies can do to ensure that a living wage is paid.
Almost every day this week fresh evidence has been presented of the corrosive effect of growing inequality on society and the economy. On Friday the ILO published a global wage report warning of wages lagging behind productivity in many countries. On Monday the Archbishop of Canterbury expressed concern about hunger in
the UK, linked to low wages and a weakened safety net. On Tuesday an OECD report discredited 'trickle down economics' and said inequality is holding back economic growth. This week a bill on modern slavery is being debated in the British parliament, while Anti Slavery International marks 175 years
of campaigning and laments that its work remains so much in need. And today is International Human Rights Day.
Companies often talk about the number of jobs they create, but these are usually measured by quantity, not quality.
These communications echo Oxfam's own analysis in our report Even It Up: Time to End Extreme Inequality. This reported that, amongst other things, ordinary workers are taking home an ever-dwindling slice of the economic pie, as a declining share of GDP goes to labour and ever more goes to investors and executives.
Companies often talk proudly about the number of jobs their businesses create, but these are usually measured in quantity rather than quality. With the UN Framework on Business and Human Rights raising the bar for corporate responsibility, it is time for companies to take a hard look at the number of unacceptably 'low road' jobs in their supply chain, and what it
would take to move them to the 'higher road' end of the Work Spectrum.
Based on my experience as Oxfam's Ethical Trade Manager, there are THREE drivers of poverty wages:
- Unfair share of value in the chain: Companies are pushing their costs and risk onto the most vulnerable people. Recent Oxfam reports found poverty wages being paid by businesses in Malawi, Vietnam and Kenya that were supplying some of the UK's most successful companies. We calculated that Kenyan flower workers' wages could be doubled if just 5 pence was added to a £4 bunch of roses.
- Absence of collective bargaining: In Denmark, an employee flipping burgers for Burger King gets $20 an hour, based on a collective bargaining agreement; a US employee in the same company but denied this bargaining opportunity gets just $8.90. Something like 90% of workers in food and garment supply chains cannot negotiate terms with their employers.
- Inadequate minimum wages: The minimum wage for banana workers in the Dominican Republic is just 40% of a living wage; for Bangladesh it is nearer 20%.
These factors taken together create an almost perfect recipe for growing inequality. The average income of CEOs in the UK's top 100 companies has nearly doubled in ten years, while many workers have seen wages decline in real terms. This is unfair and unsustainable.
How does the growing disconnect between wealth at the top and bottom of supply chains fit with companies' values?
What are the forces driving companies forward to address low wages, both the narrow financial business case and the broader one of regaining society's trust?
What are other companies doing in this area, and what has been learnt from the steps they have taken? What hinders further progress?
Today, Oxfam publishes Steps towards a living wage in global supply chains. This issue briefing attempts to answer these questions. We look at what's driving the problem and give credit to companies which are taking steps in the right direction. But though these are all welcome, we also go into why we believe more systemic change is needed, so that governments set minimum wages that people can genuinely live
on, workers can negotiate the terms of their employment, and employers have the know-how and commercial flexibility to provide better jobs.
We hope that the briefing helps companies get it right on this challenging issue, described by the head of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre as 'one of the most powerful tools for business to contribute to their workers' human rights.'
A round-up of other blogs on the issue of living wage